okay...

Aug. 16th, 2013 09:22 pm
kierthos: (Default)
The RNC is officially threatening to do... something... if CNN and NBC continue to make Hilary Clinton movies.

You see, each of those two networks is planning on making/broadcasting movies about Hilary Clinton. And even though the 2016 election is... let's see... divide by 6, carry the 1... 3 whole fucking years away, and there's no guarantee that Hilary will run for the Democratic nomination, the RNC is losing their goddamned mind over the possibility.

So they're threatening to not hold any debates on those channels. Seeing as how the RNC may be planning on a whole metric shitload of debates (there were 20 in the 2012 lead-up), it would actually be refreshing to have a couple of channels that debates don't appear on.

Mind you, the RNC can't officially stop NBC or CNN from hosting a debate. It just won't be an official debate. I guess maybe some of the candidates wouldn't show up? Or they'd be marginally less polite to one another?

Meh, fuck 'em.
kierthos: (Default)
when I say, "Oh hell no."

On the other hand, it would give her the opportunity to quit another office early.

wait, what?

Jul. 3rd, 2013 08:53 pm
kierthos: (Default)
Republican politicians: We don't like Obamacare!
Republican politicians: We're going to repeal Obamacare in the House 37 times!
Republican politicians: The employer mandate in Obamacare is terribad for business!

Obama spokesman: We're delaying the employer mandate until at least 2015, in order to work some problems out.

*beat*

Republican politicians: We demand an investigation into why the thing we hate so much is being delayed!


All that's missing is "I didn't get a harumph out of that guy."
kierthos: (Default)
Motherfucker say what?

Yes, indeed... one of the authors of the Patriot Act is upset that the NSA has its' hands on millions of Verizon customers' records. Because, fuck, I don't know... it's only okay under Republican Presidents?
kierthos: (Default)
Jim Inhofe, R-OK, and all already prick, voted against disaster relief bills for the people affected by Hurricane Sandy. Of course, it's not the same thing at all when his state gets fucked up.

Because Okies are "real Americans" and New Yorkers and New Jerseyites aren't. (Or some such bullshit that he'll foist off as an excuse.)

Look, I don't wish disasters on anyone. (I know, I know, that's a lie, but roll with it.) But Inhofe is seriously contending for "Senate Asshole of the Year" here. (Honestly, he should just be awarded the "Senate Asshole Lifetime Achievement Award".)
kierthos: (Default)
The House of Representatives voted to repeal Obamacare... this makes the 37th time... because the new Republican members hadn't had a chance to do so yet.

Wow... they're giving the lil' baby Republican Representatives a nice shiny rattle symbolic vote.

Said vote being a festering waste of time, but hey... it's not like there's actual issues to deal with.

you know

May. 12th, 2013 09:10 pm
kierthos: (Default)
I can't be the only one who wishes that Sarah Palin would just shut the entire fuck up, right?

I mean, yeah, okay, some IRS officials stepped over the line by extra-double-special scrutinizing some Tea Party groups to see whether they should have tax-exempt status.

Except, you know, that's kind of part of their job. Did they go overboard on it? Well.... here's the thing. Not a single fucking one of those groups lost their tax-exempt status because of the IRS. Some of those groups removed their applications for tax exempt status, but that's it.

Now, they should be hammered for lying to Congress about it, but come the fuck on, already.

*sigh*

May. 11th, 2013 09:50 pm
kierthos: (Default)
Rand Paul - still fucking crazy.

As for the Small Arms Treaty... he's either stupid, because it doesn't take any anyone's guns in the U.S., or he's pandering to a base that is stupid. I'm not sure which one is worse.
kierthos: (Default)
Ann Romney still continues to blame everyone else for her man Mitt not being President.

Ann, here's a thought. Maybe people didn't vote for Mitt, not because the voters didn't get to know him, but because he was a terrible candidate. Now, I know, he was still probably the best of the batch... I mean, imagine the ass-beating that would have happened if Gingrich had won the nomination. That shit would have been brutal.

Or Santorum... yeah... you know, looking back at the field of candidates, the problem was that everyone knew it was going to end up being Mitt Romney. It's just that it took so long for the primaries to settle it out, that everyone got tired of him. I mean, no one was looking at Michele Bachmann's or Herman Cain's candidacies and thinking anything other than "Yeah right."

That and, I don't know... he just couldn't connect with most swing voters. Let's face facts. There's a hard-core bunch of Democratic voters who will vote Democratic, no matter what. Likewise, there's a hard-core bunch of Republican voters who will vote Republican, no matter what. Unless you're an amazing as hell candidate, you've got to appeal to the swing voters. And Mitt couldn't.

Hell, between the "47% video" and every other damn misstep his campaign made ("Really, Mitt? Really? This year is when you're sending a horse to the Olympics?" and "Tax returns? Why would you ever want to look at those?) I'm surprised he did as well as he did.

*sigh*

Feb. 27th, 2013 08:05 am
kierthos: (Default)
Another clueless Republican joins the birthers.

1) Why is this still a thing?

2) Uh, Tom... can I call you Tom? There's a reason the mainstream media hasn't investigated this more deeply. It's the same reason that they haven't investigated whether Obama's a Reptoid. BECAUSE IT'S A FUCKING NUTTER THEORY!

*sigh*

Feb. 14th, 2013 05:38 pm
kierthos: (Default)
And the Republicans in Senate have just blocked Chuck Hagel's nomination, making this the first time a cabinet level position has been filibustered.

The reason? "We need more answers on what President Obama was doing the night of the Benghazi attack!" That's pretty much verbatim from that walking Alzheimer's patient, John McCain.

Well, fudgenuts, I can tell you this, he wasn't reading "The Pet Goat."

Well, damn.

Dec. 6th, 2012 05:45 pm
kierthos: (Default)
Jim DeMint is leaving the Senate in early 2013. (His term didn't end until 2016.)

He's apparently going to be taking over at the Heritage Foundation (it's a conservative think-tank.) I can only assume that he's getting more money for that, and that there's some new restrictions on active members of Congress that he's ducking out to avoid. ("If you resign from the Senate before such-and-such date, this doesn't apply to you" kind of thing.)

Good fucking riddance.
kierthos: (Default)
Paul Ryan can't explain Mitt Romney's tax plan, because "It would take too long."

This is the tax plan that would lower taxes for everyone (presumably, even that 47% of the country that Mitt detests), and somehow still be revenue neutral. The plan that they haven't provided any real details on.

The plan that Ryan would explain, but it would take too long to explain the math to us.
kierthos: (Default)
Some Republicans are now claiming that the reason Mitt is trailing in the polls is that the pollsters are calling too many Democrats.

....

Okay, sure, it's possible that Democrats are over-sampled in some polls. Depending on the state, and the area being called, it could be really oversampled. But that's why they poll hundreds of people. And that's why there are multiple polls. And that's why those polls have margins of error.

So, is it possible that Mitt is behind in the polls because the polls are biased? Sure.

It's also possible that Mitt is behind in the polls because he's an unlikeable dick with a tendency to stick his foot in his mouth and the personal charm and charisma of a dead fish. It's possible that he's behind in the polls because every time he tries to sympathize with anyone other then the very rich, no one buys it for a second. And it could be that he's behind in the polls, because he's just behind in the polls.

We'll see what the results are come Election Day, but if I were Ann Romney, I wouldn't worry about what curtains to put up in the White House.
kierthos: (Default)
Paul Ryan, the Republican's VP candidate, is going to be running ads for his re-election to his seat in Congress.

On one hand, this isn't actually that abnormal. On the other hand, well, looks like he's aware that Mitt's screwing the pooch on getting elected.

Wow...

Aug. 26th, 2012 05:52 pm
kierthos: (Default)
Mitt flip-flops on everything. Including whether he was active at Bain Capital or not.

So, he's inactive at Bain Capital when it comes to closing businesses and outsourcing jobs, but he's active at Bain Capital when it comes to reducing his tax burden. Why, that makes complete and logical sense, and the GOP base will completely fucking ignore it.
kierthos: (Default)
Ann Romney: Fuck you all, you're not getting any more tax returns. (I'm punching it up a little.)

Here's what gets me about this issue.

They're damned if they do, and they're damned if they don't. Okay, look, your typical member of the Republican base is not going to give a monkey's brass balls about this, but Romney cannot win with just the Republican base. He needs to attract some independents. And one of the things those independents are looking at are the lack of info on his tax returns.

If he doesn't give out more years' worth of returns, the Obama campaign and various Democratic allies will say he's hiding something. Could he be hiding something? Sure. He could. But you can damn well know that someone at the IRS has since checked those returns over and over again.

If he does release more returns, and there's nothing majorly damning there, people will ask why the hell he hid them for so long. So, I have to imagine there's something there, that while not illegal (because the IRS would have a goddamned field day), would hurt his campaign.

Except.

Except he's basically been running since 2007. Yeah, he lost the nomination battle in 2007 to McCain (he came in third, just slightly behind Huckabee, in overall delegates), but you know he was thinking, even then, that he would be running again in 2012 if McCain didn't win. And as we know, McCain didn't win.

So, at the very least, he could have made his returns look nice and politically safe for at least a couple more years then he's released. Which is just further fuel on the fire.

So what could be in there? Massive donations to the Mormon Church? Ehhh... you know, I'm an atheist, but if someone wants to donate huge whacks of their own cash to a religion, fuck it, it's their money. Could it be that he's paying a really low tax rate because most of his income is through capital gains? Well, that actually wouldn't be a shock. It's assumed that's the case, in fact. Could it be that he's worth a quarter of a billion dollars? Fuck it, we already know he's out of touch with the middle class and the poor, based on his "I have friends who own NASCAR teams" statements.

Personally, I think even if you set this issue aside, he doesn't have much of a chance of becoming President in 2012. Does that mean he'll run again in 2016 if Obama gets a second term? Frankly, I doubt it. He's be 69 then, same age as Reagan when he got elected, and Reagan's the record holder. (McCain, if he had won, would have been 72, and if you don't think his age combined with Sarah Palin's lack of... well, everything... played into their defeat, you're fooling yourself.)
kierthos: (Default)
Paul Ryan: The President's stimulus package is a horrible waste of money!

*beat*

Pssst.... can you send some of that stimulus money to us? (Not directly to Ryan, just businesses in Wisconsin. Some of which were green jobs, which is also opposed to, given his statements on the Energy Department.)

Huh?

Aug. 12th, 2012 02:07 pm
kierthos: (Default)
Why do I see this as a talking point on the Daily Show tomorrow? The Romney campaign requested several years of tax return info from potential VP candidates.

Personally, if I had been a contender for the spot, I'd have asked for the same from Romney, but I'm just that sort of asshole.
kierthos: (Default)
Mitt Romney is going to announce his choice for VP today.

And apparently, Marco Rubio, Tim Pawlenty and Rob Portman have all been told it isn't going to be them. Sorry guy, but you've been passed over for... Paul Ryan?

Honestly, I think Rubio would have been a smarter choice. It's not like Republicans were going to get a shitload of the Latino vote anyway, but Rubio might have gotten them some. (Probably not a whole lot, as the whole "Cubans who land on U.S. soil are automagically granted safe harbor, and everyone else fleeing a life of poverty or violence in Central or South America can go fuck themselves" has not engendered a whole bunch of warm fuzzies all around.) But Florida is a swing state, and picking Rubio would probably garner him a few points there. (Obama's got a slim lead there in the latest polls...)

But yeah, apparently, it's going to be Paul Ryan. Unless it isn't. I'm sure I'll have something snarky to say regardless of who he picks.

So...

Aug. 7th, 2012 12:00 pm
kierthos: (Default)
Harry Reid has raised the bar on the whole thing with Mitt Romney's tax returns. He's claiming that someone from Bain Capital (and he's not saying who) told him that Mitt didn't pay any taxes for 10 years.

Now, the IRS has a decent track record of catching people cheating on their taxes (not perfect, just decent), and you know after this shit hit the fan, someone there probably went back and looked over them "just in case".

Still, given the whole rigamarole over "Americans who aren't paying taxes" (by which they mean that they get a refund or whatever), this isn't good for Romney. It's not going away any time soon, and he could solve it by releasing some documents, but he won't, for whatever reason.

Sit back and get the popcorn.
kierthos: (Default)
for Mittens.

(Yes, it's a conglomerate of polls. Yes, polls can be and have been wrong. This still cheers me up.)
kierthos: (Default)
"We can't have really restrictive term limits on politicians, because they'll barely learn how to do their jobs well before having to give them up."

Uh, what?

Okay, let's say that we restrict, say, Representatives to three 2-year terms (total of six years), which somehow comes across as a terrible idea.

Look, if you can't learn how to do your job (show up, read legislation, vote on legislation, have three martini lunch, fuck off for rest of day) inside of a couple of weeks, you're doing something wrong. And half the fucking time, they don't even bother reading the legislation. "Oh, I'm a {insert party} and this is from {same party}. I'm for it." Or "Oh, I'm a {insert party} and this is from {other party}. I'm against it."

Yeah, yeah... if you're on one of the big committees, you actually have other shit to do.... ahahahahahaha... yeah, not so much. Pretty much boils down to "Same shit, different room."

Fuck that. They should no longer get to vote on their own raises either, for that matter. In fact, we should vote on whether they get pay raises or pay cuts.
kierthos: (Default)
Pennsylvania officials admit that they have no proof of in-person voter fraud or any evidence that voter fraud would increase without a voter-ID law.

But the law must still be passed... because aliens. (No, seriously, this comes across about as respectable as that nimrod on the History Channel.)

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags