kierthos: (Default)
One aircraft carrier strike group is already in the Arabian Sea, and another is on it's way there, but it has nothing to do with Iran.

Uh huh. Sure.

I quote Bill Hicks:
Go back to bed, America. Your government has figured out how it all transpired. Go back to bed, America. Your government is in control again. Here. Here's American Gladiators. Watch this, shut up. Go back to bed, America. Here is American Gladiators. Here is 56 channels of it! Watch these pituitary retards bang their fucking skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom. Here you go, America! You are free to do as we tell you! You are free to do what we tell you!
Now, look. I'm not that big of a liberal... if Iran closes or even attempts to close the Strait of Hormuz... well, they have to know it's going to lead to an ass-whipping. But our own government has a second carrier strike group heading to the Arabian Sea, and it's not about Iran? WTF? Did Bahrain start some shit that no one's heard about yet?
kierthos: (Default)
An Iranian actress was sentenced to one year in jail and 90 lashes for her role in a film about the limits imposed on artists in Iran.

Because, obviously, punishing someone for being in a film about restrictions on free speech is just fine and dandy. It's not hypocritical at all.

(Yes, I'm aware that Iran probably doesn't have freedom of speech.)
kierthos: (Default)
Missing Iranian nuclear scientist defected to U.S. .... last June.

Okay, okay... it doesn't say he defected last June, but he 'went missing' last June. Man, I sure hope he didn't leave behind any family he gave a shit about.

*sigh*

Feb. 8th, 2010 12:08 pm
kierthos: (Default)
Iran says it wants to send it's uranium out to other countries to get it enriched, then goes ahead and starts enriching it themselves.

The article title is "Iran moves closer to nuke warhead capacity", when it really should be "Iran one step closer to losing some facilities to Israeli bombing".

The enriching process that Iran is moving to start would take some of their uranium to 20% enriched. (You need 85% enriched or better to make what we would consider nuclear weapons grade uranium, but you can use 20% for a nuclear weapon... it just takes a lot more.... on the order of 400 kg at 20% enriched vs. 55 at 85% enriched.)

Of course, who the hell knows, come February 11th (the anniversary of the Iranian Revolution), there could be another huge demonstration from the opposition in Iran.
kierthos: (Default)
No. Really.

Iran vows revenge for death of professor. Here's what gets me... according to the article, the assassination of the professor in question was done in a 'Zionist style'.

Hrm.

It's also an IRA style, a Hamas style, and probably a Mexican drug cartel style (although they seem to prefer beheading opponents or shooting up drug clinics).
kierthos: (Default)
Iran: We had information Israel, U.S. intended to attack us!

Yeah.... um, Iran, I hate to break it to you, but if Israel was going to attack you... you'd know it. They wouldn't assassinate a nuclear physicist who isn't associated with your nuclear program. They would bomb your nuclear facilities. And while we no longer have Captain Subtlety (Bush the Younger) as President, I think that if the U.S. decided to do something about Iran, it would be a little more obvious.

And for further lulz (from the article): "An American-based monarchy group...claimed responsibility for this terrorist act,"

Um, what? We don't have a monarchy, so I can only assume they're referring to some group based here in the U.S. that supports the Shah of Iran. Except, he's dead. His son could, in theory, claim the title, but yeah.... don't see it happening.
kierthos: (Default)
Iranian nuclear scientist killed in bomb blast

Of course, Iran is blaming Israel for this. Because right now, in a country that's had regular protests since a widely criticized election months ago, ramping up to deaths of protestors just a couple weeks ago, why of course it's Israel behind this, and not one or another faction in Iran. Because everything is hunky-dory in Iran, despite all the evidence. Who are you going to believe - Ahmadinejad or your own eyes?

Edit: The plot thickens! It turns out that the dead physicist supported the opposition (Mousavi), so this really takes away from the idea that Israel was behind this. (But who really believed Israel was behind this?)

what?

Jan. 4th, 2010 04:53 am
kierthos: (Default)
Apparently, acting like a decent human being whilst a Iranian official of any sort is wrong.

.... seriously, he sent an e-mail to Israel's FIFA team and that's bad?

Dear Iran, please join the 20th century. (Yes, I know it's the 21st century, but Iran apparently has to take baby steps with this kind of thing.)
kierthos: (Default)
Iran's opposition leader, Mir Hossein Mousavi, says he's ready to die in defense of the protest against the Iranian regime.

But this says he's "ready to retreat" on his stance. (Please note, this was delivered, not by Mousavi, but by another presidential candidate. It's also from a site on Iran's TLD, which basically means that it's one of the allowed news sources from Iran, so it's 'grain of salt' time.)

Intriguing.....
kierthos: (Default)
Iran continues to blame Western nations for uprisings

Because, you know, being an authoritarian dictatorship with only a token's worth of democracy (haha) makes your citizens calm and happy with the brutal heel of oppression. They're shooting protesters, arresting the relatives of people who criticize the government (because in some cases, the people they want to arrest are no longer in Iran), and generally being dicks. But nope, it's all a Western plot. It has nothing to do with their own policies at all. Voter fraud? Bah. Repressive policies? Foolishness.

Why, you'd think it was a theocratic regime that severely curtails the rights of their citizens and enforces its own decrees by unilaterally deciding who gets to run for any major office. STUFF AND NONSENSE!

So.... I'm guessing that 2010 is going to see a lot more interesting shit go down in Iran.
kierthos: (Default)
Ahmadinejad says report of Iran trying to design an atomic bomb trigger is forged.

Here's the thing. Given how Bush faked his way into invading Iraq, even if Iran were trying to develop nuclear weapons, I wouldn't expect them to say so. Because while we might or might not actually do anything about it (chickenhawking from Limbaugh aside, we would be hard pressed to fight a land war in Iran right now), Israel would be sure to react badly if Iran admitted to a nuclear weapons program. And by react badly, I mean bomb the shit out of any site that they suspected was part of that program.

Still, you have to love quotes like this:
""You should know that if we had any intention of building a bomb, we would have had enough guts and courage to announce that without any fear from you."
And you know, I think they would. I mean, sure, if it was entirely Ahmadinejad's decision to announce it (it isn't), then yeah... he'd be shouting it from the rooftops. Mind you, he'd have company, what with all the other Iranians shouting "Death to the dictator!" (which, by the way, is Ahmadinejad and co.)
kierthos: (Default)
We (the U.S.) claim that some of the insurgents in Iraq are being trained, backed, and/or supplied by Iran, and Iran says "NUH UH!" and gets a case of the chapped ass over the suggestion that the insurgents could be anything other then people pissed at the U.S. backed regime in Iraq.

But when insurgents in Iran blow shit up, the Iranian reaction is to say that "Hey, the U.S. and Britain are behind this shit." because it couldn't possibly be a shit-upon minority in a repressive regime acting in the only way available to them, especially after the recent Iranian election folderol (where the Iran government managed to count millions of ballots in a few hours, beat up and imprisoned protestors, and so forth).

Nah. Has to be U.S./Britain backed insurgents. Has to be. (Let's not forget that there are heavily armed drug smugglers in that region of Iran as well.)
kierthos: (Default)
Ahmadinejad offers to buy US uranium.

He's offering to buy uranium that is 20% enriched, with the idea that it's to be used to produce nuclear medicines. Nuclear medicines don't directly use uranium; rather they use the fission and decay products of the uranium. In that light, hey, you know, doesn't sound bad, right?

Because, you know, he says that a bomb needs uranium enriched to 99.7%, so we could sell Iran the 20% enriched uranium. Except, of course, that he's wrong. Nuclear weapons typically contain 85% enriched U-235, and a crude, horribly inefficient weapon could be as low as... wait for it... 20% enriched. Huh. (To note, the less uranium is enriched, the more you need for critical mass. At 85% enriched, you need 55 kilograms. At 20% enriched, you need 400 kilograms, and at 15% enriched, you need over 600 kilograms.)

So, yeah, I don't see the U.S. falling for this.
kierthos: (Default)
Ahmadinejad caves in, dismisses Mashai.

He didn't last to the weekend. The world may continue calling Ahmadinejad a puppet dancing to the tune that Khamenei plays.
kierthos: (Default)
Ahmadinejad humiliated over vice president choice.

Okay, so basically, Ahmadinejad recently picked a guy named Esfandiar Rahim Mashai to be the First Vice-President. (Not first as they've never had one before, but first in rank. Iran has twelve vice-presidents.) Mashai also happens to be Ahmadinejad's son's father-in-law.

He is also, apparently, a soppy liberal. Well, no, not how we would probably consider things. But to Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (the guy who is really in charge in Iran), Mashai is a problem. You see, back in 2008, Mashai dared to say that Iranians were "friends of all people in the world - even Israelis." You can imagine how well that went over.

So, Ahmadinejad picking him as a political ally resulted in... drum roll please... Khamenei ordering Ahmadinejad to dismiss Mashai from his newly appointed post.

Here's the kicker... will Ahmadinejad do it? Honestly, he probably will. But Ahmadinejad is in a pretty good position to stand up for his choice. Basically, all the political turmoil over the (almost certainly rigged) election means that the overall power structure (Khamanei and the rest of the Guardian Council) preferred Ahmadinejad to his chief rival in the election, Mousavi, despite the fact that all major decisions are made, regardless of who is President, by the Supreme Leader.

But, Khamenei needs Ahmadinejad to stay in office and look like a strong leader just as much as Ahmadinejad needs Khamenei's support. If Ahmadinejad is forced to dismiss Khamenei, it weakens Ahmadinejad. Even more, although this is highly unlikely, it could result in Ahmadinejad stepping down. That, friends and neighors, would really stir things up in Iran.

No, I don't think Ahmadinejad will step down if he is forced to dismiss Mashai. But it is an interesting thought, isn't it?
kierthos: (Default)
Iranian clerical group says vote result "invalid"

This is a group of Shi'ite clerics disagreeing with the words of the Iranian Ayatollah (who, according to general Iranian thought, receives marching orders from Allah).

This is the equivalent of a bunch of Catholic Cardinals publicly saying that the Pope is completely full of shit.

Yeah... this shit isn't going to end any time soon.

Bwuh?

Jun. 22nd, 2009 02:28 am
kierthos: (Default)
Iran's election authority has said that the claims of voting irregularites are unfounded.

Really.

Dear Iranian election authority, isn't it true that in dozens of cities in Iran, the total number of votes received exceeds the number of registered voters in those cities?

Iranian election authority: Umm.. yeah. But those votes didn't noticeably influence the overall results.

But aren't those still voting irregularities?

Iranian election authority: No. Now go away. We have to have brutal militia beat up unarmed women and old people. It's very hard work.

*sigh* Yeah, this isn't going well, and it's going to get worse.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags