I'm on the side of the old lady

See, I don't get e-readers. I mean, why would I want something with a tiny-ass screen so it's difficult to read, that can lose battery power so I can't read anything on it, and that I'd have to re-buy any books I wanted to read on it?
The argument for them goes something like "but you can put dozens of books on it instead of carrying around dozens of books". Well, yes, that would be an advantage IF I felt the need to normally carry dozens of books around. Shockingly, I don't haul dozens of books around, or have a team of sherpas to carry a large literary assortment.
Plus, even the cheap ones are a couple hundred bucks. Now, this doesn't make sense to me. "But it's new technology!" No, it's not. We have had these things called laptops for a number of years now. Why would I want to pay more for the junior woodchuck version that I can only read books on? (Yes, there's a version of the Kindle that runs more then some laptops. Why? I haven't the slightest clue.)

no subject
no subject
no subject
I haven't used any official one but I've come to love the kindle app on my ipod touch. The font is sized and laid out for good readability and I dig $3.95 novels that I can get instantly without a trip to the store.
But I still prefer an actual book given the choice.
no subject
no subject
no subject