kierthos: (Default)
kierthos ([personal profile] kierthos) wrote2004-07-13 04:05 pm

DVDs obsolete in 10 years? Yeah, right.

So there's this article where Bill Gates is saying that DVDs will be obsolete in 10 years. One of the quotes from the article is "If you consider that nowadays we have to carry around film and music on little silver discs and stick them in the computer, it's ridiculous."

Yes, Bill, just as ridiculous as carrying around information on floppy disks, ZIP disks, CDs, or flash drives.

Now, think about it. In terms of computer technology (for home use), we've gone from from 5 1/4" disks that barely held anything, even back then, to flash drives that can go on a keychain that can hold 80 GB and are available at practically every computer store. 80 GB. That's twice the size of my hard drive.

What does this have to do with DVDs? Well, a lot, if you think about it. How many different digital storage ideas have never even left R&D in the last 20 years? I have no idea, but I'm betting a lot of them. How many media storage methods for movies and music have never even left R&D in the same time? I'm willing to bet a lot of those too. How many of the latter have actually been marketed and failed, badly? Anyone remember Betamax? (If you don't, don't feel bad.) It took a while for most people to make the transition from records to 8-tracks. And then from 8-tracks to casette tapes. And then from casettes to CDs. But you can still buy casette tape players in many stores. Sure, it will be the combo tape-CD-radio player, but the option is there.

And VCRs and tapes still sell well enough that most stores, especially major chains, haven't converted entirely to DVDs. I think Circuit City is the only one, and even then, I'm not 100% on that.

Sure, CD sales probably greatly outpace casette sales. And DVD sales probably outpace VCR tape sales. But trying to claim that DVDs will be obsolete in 10 years, Bill? Come on, man. That's just a joke.

Re: Actually, you make his point for him...

[identity profile] gurgi.livejournal.com 2004-07-13 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
So what if Flash drives are currently "computer storage"?

So were CD-ROM's...

Why not use USB-like items to hold a movie? Storage of the physical object alone would make it insanely popular (for those who have a tower or five of DVDs, a shoe-box could hold their entire collection...

Or even use them, go to a store kiosk, and pay 12 bucks, you DL the movie and extras onto a memory stick-like object... Easier by far...

It would take off, and mean FAR more profit for the movie companies, because they wouldn't have to have the CD's pressed, and packageing make...

That is, i have little doubt, what Bill is thinking...

Re: Actually, you make his point for him...

[identity profile] eddyfate.livejournal.com 2004-07-13 01:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Until you get a foolproof method of piracy prevention, I don't see that happening.

"Hey man, want a copy of Spider-Man 17? I got it on my keychain."

Re: Actually, you make his point for him...

[identity profile] kierthos.livejournal.com 2004-07-13 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
True. There are enough problems with movie piracy now. I mean, days before general release, you could find copies of Spider-Man 2 being shared on the KaZaa network.

It's to the point where the members of the Academy who get comp'd copies of movies to vote on are getting extra layers of protection/paranoia on them so those copies don't become distributed over the 'net.

(Oh yes, and that law in California where you can't take movie recorders into theaters.)

Re: Actually, you make his point for him...

[identity profile] kierthos.livejournal.com 2004-07-13 01:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Possibly.

But it's pretty easy to lose those little memory stick things too. (We have this box at work that we put disks and such that are left behind by customers. The vast majority of disks in it at any time are floppy disks. Then there are some CDs. Maybe a ZIP disk or two (not too many of the locals use ZIP disks). And hardly ever a memory stick/flash drive. Why? Those things are expensive compared to a spindle of CDs.) I mean, Bill's quote was that it was silly to have to put the media in the computer, so I imagine what he would like to see is something like the Pay On Demand movie system, only on a much wider scale.

Re: Actually, you make his point for him...

[identity profile] kostika.livejournal.com 2004-07-13 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually the pay on demand idea isn't all bad. The biggest problem with that is that banks charge the same amount to process $5 as they do $50. This gets to be very expensive for people who are trying to do this kind of thing. The idea is actually a good one. Would work for things like music and tv shows too. So until banks bend to micro-payments and not charging so much to process small payments, we won't get this kind of thing even though its a good idea.

btw..bill's an idiot.